![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj-L_Mie0R5DE86J7OlF6FEJ6RjbvyLr75Twd8Ie_hlkWs34FNBBtElPm2s6_zOKFuIlX-BjWfcnmbJAmp6ZE2Rhwxn7hX-edK2D6UZaGG5R9R9fpyY5c4Ojxt0hP-JDcNPNkBWCUtY5gWZ/s400/Fullscreen+capture+5242009+113133+PM.bmp.jpg)
Then, Exhibit B:
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhzZNDaUJdLjLGzfZSpbM3_SgBjErT3_QXPuV4DcqyLCSvAOfOudVeKsq1N0FJkwp0B0Uk9dYikUvxaA9IfFz2iFIF6gkIoqbPd1BVdE_PtZD5XH9NS__bQXf-s0crzvGz1j8T4w5W27jJN/s400/Fullscreen+capture+5242009+113210+PM.bmp.jpg)
Owning a Dyson is a dream of mine. Bagless and endless suction? *coo* I just can't sanction spending over 500$ on a vacuum. The Hoover platinum vacuums seen nice. At a much lower pricing point, I can get a wireless, rechargable ion-battery powered vacuum for no more than $150. This is obviously what I'm going to return my Nintendo DS for. My bagless wonder still has suction but it's connected to a power source that's just cramping my style. I obvi need to be rocking this hot new cordless vac. It's just suspicious to me how Dyson can be so much more expensive. This topic is obviously worth updating.
No comments:
Post a Comment